One of the most significant consequences of the term “Arab Spring” has been the evocation of a constructed timeline that placed the protests in the North Africa and the Middle East within a limited spectrum of time and space. The desire to enforce problematic nominal labels produces a narrative that shapes the way certain events are understood and discussed. The result is the acceptance of what is or is not considered legitimate dissent and the denial or reduction of historically embedded forces that continue to shape realities in the Middle East and North Africa.
Since last year, Noam Chomsky has argued that the so-called “Arab Spring” did not begin in Tunisia, but rather, it began in the Western Sahara. Chomsky slips into a dangerous framework that assumes the ongoing events in the region can be marked with a beginning, and an inevitable end that many have attempted to impose from Morocco to Yemen.
In several media appearances, Chomsky pointed to the October 2010 protests in Gdeim Izik as the beginning of the “Arab Spring.” Moroccan security forces brutally repressed the protests, resulting in the death of eleven people, and several hundred others were injured. If the “Arab Spring” refers to the recent wave of popular uprisings throughout the region, rooted in socioeconomic grievances and the opposition to authoritarianism, placing the Western Saharan struggle on this spectrum is dismissive of a long history.
The Western Saharan struggle, while also comprised of socioeconomic grievances and a desire for political freedoms, dates back to the mid-twentieth century and grew out of a colonial context, involving territorial disputes that have continued to last into today. It was entrenched in the Cold War politics that fueled many conflicts throughout the world. Moreover, placing the Western Saharan struggle at the forefront of the so-called “Arab Spring” dismisses the focal point of the conflict, which has for decades been a fight for self-determination. The matter of self-determination is an aspect of the struggle that cannot be categorized under the generalizations of what the “Arab Spring” narrative assumes: that the protests, uprisings, and movements in the Middle East and North Africa emerged from a vacuum and that they can all be labeled as a collective phenomenon with a common goal and shared outcomes.
- xgp15aii likes this
- silentambassadors likes this
- r-evolutionnaire reblogged this from jadaliyya
- selsv reblogged this from roxygen and added:
- selsv likes this
- fakjumather likes this
- r-stern likes this
- althemius likes this
- indianajosh likes this
- staringintostone likes this
- al-thaqalayn likes this
- unoeilsurlesport likes this
- scrisori-de-sertar likes this
- aaylau likes this
- peace-love-justice likes this
- nolandwithoutstones reblogged this from jadaliyya
- nolandwithoutstones likes this
- saoblues likes this
- luckyfatima reblogged this from alscientist
- attaif likes this
- cundtcake reblogged this from jadaliyya
- haralambros likes this
- roxygen likes this
- thecatsmao likes this
- roxygen reblogged this from jadaliyya
- musaafer likes this
- andsotimshel likes this